Antibiotic
Resistance – A Biological Arms Race
An arms
race by definition is “a competition between countries to achieve superiority
in quantity and quality of military arms”. Although speaking of something as
tiny as bacteria in connection to this concept may sound melodramatic, it
doesn’t make the facts any less truthful.
The
truth is that people are finding themselves on the losing side of this war
against bacterial infectious disease for some time now. Ever since the world
wars, antibiotics were heralded as “miracle” drugs and were used to beat back
the advancement of many diseases like tuberculosis, cholera and syphilis that
were considered to be formidable enough to take out large populations at a
time. Infectious diseases like these were the biggest killers of human beings
for centuries. Out of desperation, biologists began to search for the next big
medical advancement. After Alexander Flemming discovered pencillin, the
floodgates were opened and scientists got on the antibiotics bandwagon. They discovered
different classes of antibiotics like methicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin and
many others. The 1960s and the 1970s were considered to be the Golden Age of
antibiotics, when most of the classes we use today were discovered.
But what
happened after the Golden Age? In a word…nothing. Antibiotic synthesis and
production was an extremely costly and laborious process and drug companies
found that it was not cost effective to discover and mass produce more types of
antibiotics when the ones they already had were effective enough against
infections. The money started to flow towards research for obesity, diabetes, heart
disease and cancer, as they became the new killers of the brand new millennium.
Although
the health concerns of humans shifted, it didn’t mean the bacterial infections
ceased to exist. They were simply held back by the generous use of antibiotics
in the healthcare and agricultural industries. However, this overuse triggered
a phenomenon that was inevitable. The bacteria started to evolve.
Bacteria
are very simple organisms with a small genome that is contained within one
circular chromosome. They are capable of transduction (incorporating DNA via
injection by a virus), conjugation (direct transfer of DNA through joined
cells), and transformation (incorporating free floating pieces of DNA into
their genome). These unique capabilities made for formidable weaponry and meant
that while primates took thousands of years to evolve into human beings, some
bacteria took only days to evolve into strains that contain brand new genes.
What
does this mean for the arms race? It means that we are facing species capable
of adapting to any weapon we use against them and that we have been using the
same weapons over and over again since the 1970s. This has had devastating
consequences, which a 2013 CDC threat report of over a hundred pages details.
This report states that in 2013 over 23,000 deaths occurred due to antibiotic
resistant infections. This number will
continue to increase as long as people overuse the same antibiotics over the
next few decades. The CDC also reports a re-emergence of diseases like
tuberculosis and syphilis because strains have evolved to be resistant to multiple
classes of antibiotics. This means that alternative treatments to antibiotics
need to be discovered and soon. If this trend continues not only will people be
in an arms race with newly emerging “superbugs” but also with old diseases
thought to be defeated decades ago.
References
Blaser,
M. (2014). Missing Microbes: How the Overuse of Antibiotics Is Fueling Our
Modern Plagues (1st ed., Vol. 1). New York City: Henry Holt and Company.
Threat Report 2013, Antimicrobial
Resistance, CDC. (n.d.). Retrieved November 12, 2014, from
http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/index.html
Hey Sreshta, its quite fascinating knowing that these small bacteria cells are able to adapt to world around it at a rapid rate. I can see the issue you are presenting, but how do we solve this problem? If we keep making stronger and stronger antibiotics, it will only result in the bacteria evolving once again. Is it plausible to eradicate a disease once it is discovered?
ReplyDeleteYour topic is rather interesting, the fact that the golden years were the 60s and 70s as you never think that antibiotics are that young of a technology. I also never knew that bacteria can exchange DNA, thats a rather fascinating means of keeping up the gene pool's diversity. I can imagine how a system like that would lead to antibiotic superbugs but its still shocking that a new species can be formed within a few days, thats just mind boggling.
ReplyDelete